Generous Orthodoxy  


Bach Vespers at Holy Trinity Lutheran Church, New York City

 

UNIVERSAL BACH, UNIVERSAL GOSPEL

 

Sermon by Fleming Rutledge           The Feast of the Presentation of the Lord 2009

 

Texts: Luke 2:28-32 and Cantata BWV 83, Erfreute Zeit im neuen Bunde

 

******************************************

 

Johann Sebastian Bach belongs to the world. As Bach-lover Otto Bettman, founder of the Bettman Archive, has said, “[Bach] is popular in China and Japan, and he’s turning up in jazz. They understand him everywhere.” [1]

 

Indeed, Bach belongs to the universe. When Lewis Thomas, often called the “poet-philosopher of medicine,” was asked how he would approach the discovery of a new inhabited planet, this is what he said:

 

I would vote for Bach, all of Bach, streamed out into space, over and over again We would be bragging of course but it is surely excusable to put the best possible face on at the beginning of such an acquaintance. We can tell the harder truths later.” [2]

 

Put briefly, Bach is the best of what we are as a human race. Bach belongs to everyone of every race and religion or no religion at all.

 

But Bach also belongs to the Church. That is the special glory of Bach Vespers here at Holy Trinity. It is no diminishment of Bach’s universality to experience his music in a setting similar to that for which it was originally designed, and to pay attention to the words and their meaning. As you can imagine, there’s an ongoing debate about how much to emphasize text in relation to music in Bach’s vocal works. A corresponding discussion arises about the role of Christian faith in regard to them. Maasaki Suzuki, the Japanese conductor who is recording all of Bach’s works, is an ardent Christian, but he is quick to say that Bach can be magnificently performed by an unbeliever and poorly performed by an believer. [3] Perhaps we can agree, though, that one of the greatest of all joys of being a Christian believer is to hear these cantatas with the faith that the composer shared and expressed with his surpassing musical genius.

 

For Bach’s cantatas are designed as direct address to the congregation in the church. They’re not like opera, which works upon audiences indirectly as the singers on stage address one another. On the contrary: when the tenor sings in tonight’s cantata, “Hasten, heart, full of joyousness” (Eile, Herz, voll Freudigkeit), we are ourselves directly summoned to receive God’s grace and mercy in a most personal way.[4]

 

To be sure, some of the characteristics of Bach’s faith are more congenial for us today than others. When his singers seem to long for death, that’s strange to us[5] This yearning for death needs to be understood in the context of German Pietism. In this version of Protestantism, a primary theme was the union of the believer with the risen Christ in eternal life.[6] John Updike, who shocked us all by dying last week, would have understood—it is often thought that he was preoccupied with sex when what he was really haunted by was the dread of death (timor mortis perturbat me). Tonight’s cantata is written for the comfort of all who live under this shadow. [7]  Actual longing for death is present in some of the cantatas, but that isn’t a biblical theme, and it is at odds with the extraordinarily joyful love of life so evident in much of Bach’s work. Even though the tenor tonight will sing of “grief-stricken times,” Bach cannot restrain his buoyancy as he summons the soul to come boldly (kräftig beten) before the throne of grace (Gnadenstuhl).

 

The major focus of this sermon and the cantata tonight is Bach’s celebration of . the Presentation of the Lord in the Temple. [8] In my tradition, that of the English church, it’s called Candlemas. (For those who are liturgically innocent, the day is known as Groundhog Day.) The liturgical calendar played a decisive role for Bach as he composed cantatas week by week in Leipzig. [9]  It’s another great advantage of Bach Vespers at Holy Trinity that the cantatas are presented in their proper relation to the seasons and festivals of the church year.

 

The story of the Presentation in the Gospel of Luke is wonderfully suffused with the atmosphere of first-century Jewish piety. It is tragic that there was a time when Christians had forgotten that Jesus was Jewish. Today, after all that has happened in the last century, it’s urgent to remember that Jesus was born into, and raised by, a devout Jewish family. In the first three chapters of Luke’s Gospel, his Gentile readers are shown that the Savior emerges from the very heart of Hebrew history and life. Mary and Joseph bring their infant son to the Temple for the rite of purification prescribed in the Law of Moses.[10]

 

Luke introduces two characters, Simeon and Anna, who are the highest exemplars of faithful Judaism.[11] These two old people have been waiting all their lives for the redemption of Israel.[12] We are told that Simeon has received a promise from the Holy Spirit that he will not die until he has seen God’s promised Messiah with his own eyes.

 

We don’t have time tonight to consider this beautiful portion of Scripture in all its detail.[13] We’ll focus on the part that Bach quotes. In the first two lines of the bass aria and then again in the final chorale, the words are the same as the words of Simeon in the Bible. The old man takes the baby in his arms; it is the moment of recognition.[14] It is he! I have been waiting all my life to see him! Now I can die in peace, with joy! Simeon’s words have long been known in Christian tradition as the Nunc Dimittis:

 

Lord, now lettest thou thy servant depart in peace,

according to thy word;

for mine eyes have seen thy salvation…

a light for revelation to the Gentiles,

and the glory of thy people Israel.[15]  (KJV)

 

It is hard to put into sufficient words the radicality of this message. A light to the Gentiles? What is the purpose of being God’s holy chosen people if he’s going to ask us to share his glory with the godless masses? We need to make a little transposition in our minds here. Don’t think of Jews and Gentiles. Think rather of the godly and the ungodly, the righteous and the unrighteous, our kind and the other kind. That’s the point. From deep within the tradition of ancient Israel there arose a message that was often ignored but never forgotten, that through Abraham and his descendants all the families of the earth would be blessed, that when God’s full salvation arrived all the nations of the earth would come streaming into Jerusalem to participate fully in the glory of the Lord.[16]

 

When Simeon bears his witness to the Messiah in the biblical story, it’s a direct call to the believer to yield in faith to the same thrill of recognition and fulfilment that Simeon experiences. Bach has structured his cantata so that we will see how the promise to Israel has come to those who do not know God. There is no one who is excluded from this promise. Its power reaches out across every obstacle and beyond every barrier. In the words of the climactic chorale, the good shepherd is “the salvation and blessed light for the Gentiles,” for “those who know him not,” and he will “bring them to pasture.” This message is universal. It is not for the “religious” or the “spiritual.” It is for “the ungodly” as St. Paul wrote. It is for those who are on the wrong side of the fence, “beyond the Pale.” Who is the Other? Palestinians? Israelis? Homosexuals? Homophobes? Illegal immigrants? Youths on murderous anti-Latino rampages?[17] There is always an Other. To some people, you and I are the Other. There is someone somewhere who would like to see you eliminated. From this cycle of recrimination, this spiral of vengeance, this reign of death, we need to be delivered by a power even greater than the universe itself. At the moment when the infant Messiah is recognized in the temple, the gospel opens up to become “the salvation and blessed light” for the godless, the heathen, the enemy, those who know Him not. There is no boundary, no wall, no obstacle so impenetrable that the righteousness of God cannot pass through it. There is no resistance so great that he cannot triumph over it by the power of his graciousness. There is no barrier in your heart tonight that cannot be breached by the love and mercy of God as it shines forth through the music of his faithful servant Johann Sebastian Bach.

 

END.

 

Quotations from Bach’s cantata 83 are from an English translation by Tobin ===



[1] Quoted by Naomi Bliven,  “Bettman’s Bach,” in The Talk of the Town, The New Yorker, date?  I have changed the order of the two sentences for rhetorical purposes.

[2]Lewis Thomas, “poet-philosopher of medicine,” president of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, dean of Medical Schools at NYU and Yale, source of quotation lost.

[3] Bernard D. Sherman, “Coming to Fresh Terms with the Sacred in Bach,” The New York Times, 5/20/2001.

[4] Jaroslav Pelikan argues similarly, writing that whereas Handel’s oratorios (which were performed in theatres) as well as operas engage us emotionally, they “[do] not demand of us that we respond with an existential decision for or against the claims of the story…For that reason, the natural habitat for Bach’s Passions [and cantatas] is still the church.” Pelikan, Bach Among the Theologians, 78.

[5] Director Peter Sellars’ reaction to this strangeness was to dress Lorraine Hunt Lieberson in a hospital gown and hook her up to tubes, with the intent of explaining why she would long for death (Ich habe genug—as if she were saying, “I’ve had enough!”). This seems a travesty of Bach’s intention, but then, Bach belongs to Sellars too.

[6] The background here is the Thirty Years War in which the European population was reduced from sixteen million to less than six, followed by successive epidemics of plague. In the aftermath of these calamities, it is not so strange that Christians longed to hear the message of union with Christ in his Resurrection as supreme consolation to the individual for whom intimate contact with death was part of daily life.

[7] New Testament theologian Paul Minear writes, “ Bach believed that the biblical text was designed to release within the reader an intense kind of spiritual activity. The interpreter must therefore help the text produce in his own audience an emotional action appropriate to the text at hand. He should give priority not to the axis between the Gospel and other ancient books, nor between each successive sentence and the biblical author’s conscious and literal intent, but to that [axis] between the events narrated and the contemporary audience whose members are called on to respond to those event in unqualified immediacy and with their whole being.” Paul S. Minear, “J. S. Bach and J. A. Ernesti: A Case Study in Theological and Exegetical Conflict,” in John Deschner and others, eds., Our Common History as Christians: Essays in Honor of Albert C. Outler, Oxford University Press, 1975, 131-55. Quoted by Jaroslav Pelikan, Bach Among the Theologians, 39.

[8]The Presentation of our Lord, as it is called in the West, has been observed since the fourth century. It celebrates the event described in Luke 2:22-40. In the Greek Church, the feast day is called “The Meeting of the Lord” (Hypapante Kuriou), because it commemorates the meeting of the infant Jesus with Simeon and Anna, who as representatives of God’s people Israel have been waiting and hoping for the Messiah all their lives. The feast has long had two different emphases. In some segments of the Roman Catholic church, and in some Anglo-Catholic churches, the feast is called the “Feast of the Purification [of Mary]” because of a wish to focus on the Mother of Christ. Throughout Christian history, however, the day has been officially acknowledged as a Feast of Our Lord, so the preferred designation is “The Presentation of the Lord.” The Biblical emphasis is clearly on the recognition of the infant by the two faithful Jewish elders, who are guided by the Spirit.

[9] His Leipzig cantatas were composed in five complete cycles for the liturgical calendar. These numbered about 300 in all, of which approximately 2/3 have survived.

[10] The required rite is described in Leviticus 12:6-8. Actually, Luke has conflated two separate Israelite customs. One was the presentation and consecration of the firstborn male child to the service of the Lord. A Levite child would remain in the service of the Temple; other male children had to be “redeemed” (bought back) by the payment of five shekels to the Temple (Numbers 8:15-16). The purification of the mother after childbirth, a separate and distinct rite, is based on Leviticus 12:6. Whether from ignorance or intent, Luke has combined the two to great effect, emplacing the dedication of the infant Jesus to the Lord’s service as well as his manifestation to Simeon and Anna. The most important Old Testament background here is the story of Hannah and her son Samuel, whom she brought to the sanctuary at Shiloh to serve the Lord (I Samuel 1:24-28). See R. E. Brown, The Birth of the Messiah (New York: Doubleday, 1977), 447-451.

[11]In the story of the Purification/ Presentation, Luke is telling us that the Law (Mary observes the Law) and the Prophets (Simeon and Anna are both prophets) are both fulfilled in Jesus.

[12] “The redemption of Israel” (Anna) and “the consolation of Israel” (Simeon) mean essentially the same thing. “Captive Israel” longs for deliverance from oppression. The word “consolation” is carried over from the Book of Consolation in Isaiah 40-66 which begins,  “Comfort ye, comfort ye my people.”

[13] This beautiful story belongs to the Epiphany season with its theme of manifestation. But the New Testament and the Church give us hints of Lent even in the midst of rejoicing. After the consoling Nunc Dimittis, Simeon has something more to say, something more disturbing. He tells Mary: “Behold, this child is set for the fall and rising of many in Israel, and for a sign that is spoken against (and a sword will pierce through your own soul also).” Even in the overwhelmingly joyful moment of revelation the shadow of the Cross is already present.

[14] This moment of recognition is unforgettably portrayed in Rembrandt’s painting of the Presentation (which hangs in the Hague museum). The vast Temple is in shadow, but a ray of light falls upon the infant and the face of Simeon as he begins to prophesy.  

[15] The scope of this sermon and this cantata do not allow for further exposition of additional important and interesting points from Luke’s narrative of the Presentation. The second part of Simeon’s utterance is a prophetic oracle. Looking into the future by the power of the Spirit, he sees that the Messiah will grow up, not to be a nationalist hero, but a “sign of contradiction” who will wield a sword of discernment and division (“falling and rising”) that will result in his crucifixion—  and even his own mother will be expected to pass through that testing (“a sword will pass through your heart also”). In Luke, Mary fails the test of discernment at first, not recognizing who her son is (Luke 2:48-9; see also 8:19-21 and 11:28)—Joseph A. Fitzmyer, The Gospel According to Luke I-IX (Garden City: Doubleday, 1981), 430; see also Brown, 462-5.

 

[16] Raymond E. Brown, in his magisterial survey of the infancy narratives in Matthew and Luke, notes the universalist trajectory of the many passages from Isaiah 40-66 that lie behind the Nunc Dimittis. (To give just one example, “The Lord has revealed his holy arm in the sight of all the Gentiles, and all the ends of the earth will see the salvation of our God”—Isaiah 52:10). However, he observes, it is a “subordinate universalism,” for the Gentiles are to come to Jerusalem to see the light. Israel is the mediator of God’s deliverance for the world. (Brown, 459). As Jesus says to the woman of Samaria, “Salvation is from the Jews” (John 4:22).

 

[17] This is a reference to events recently occurring in the outer boroughs of New York City.


Related: